|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?
Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > ... UDEF attempts to solve (or at least help) this by creating > "registered universal IDs" that provide a common frame of reference to > establish semantics. For example, the UDEF ID of "g.9_8" means the > following in the following contexts: > > MIL-STD-2549: Part Product Identifier > X12 EDI: Product/Service ID > etc. > > An XML representation would be: > > <ProductPartIdentifier UID=?9_5.8?>123-456-789</ProductPartIdentifier> > > The communicated benefit is that one can change tag names, but use of > the UID signifies "what one is *really* talking about". > why bother encoding the tag name. why not just do <!DOCTYPE SOME_UDEF SYSTEM "data:,<!ELEMENT UDEF_9_5_8 (#PCDATA) >" [ <!ATTLIST UDEF_9_5_8 ProductPartIdentifier #FIXED "TRUE"> ]> <UDEF_9_5_8>123-456-789</UDEF_9_5_8> or <!DOCTYPE SOME_UDEF SYSTEM "data:,<!ELEMENT UDEF_9_5_8 (#PCDATA) >" [ <!ATTLIST UDEF_9_5_8 MIL-STD-2549 #FIXED "Part Product Identifier"> ]> <UDEF_9_5_8>123-456-789</UDEF_9_5_8> or just <UDEF_9_5_8>123-456-789</UDEF_9_5_8> either you have got it right or you have not. despite the truism, that the generic identifer is just a special attribute, what is the advantage to making the universal depend on the ideosyncratic? ...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








