[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: URN vs URL

• To: 'Chiusano Joseph' <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Subject: RE: URN vs URL
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:02:42 -0500
• Cc: Andy Greener <andy@g...>, Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>, xml-dev@l...

No, I'm a victim.  Alabama is voting on 
a 1.2 billion tax increase next month to 
fix the problem of buying votes with 
reimbursements.  No free lunch.  We can't 
afford a gubernatorial recall. :-)

I haven't read your draft.  Did you explain 
the dereferencing problems of using http 
style URNs in namespace names?  They need 
to understand the pros and cons of both 
approaches.  Or at least, if they use the 
URN with a protocol morph that a browser 
will interpret as a hypertext control, they 
should put a representation at that 
location with something meaningful even if it 
simply says "Don't look here."

As I said to Norman, it's an issue of clarity.

len


From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@b...]

<Quote>
It is uplifting to see ideas pushed into policy that guarantee a full 
employment economy. 
</Quote>

You must be a member of Bush's Tax Cut Task Force. ;)

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote:
> 
> I don't feel offended.  It is uplifting to
> see ideas pushed into policy that guarantee a full
> employment economy.  Click throughs are profitable.
> 
> len

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URN vs URL
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URN vs URL
• Next by Date: How did XML Blueberry get its name?
• Previous by thread: Re: URN vs URL
• Next by thread: Re: URN vs URL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread