[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: threads (was Re: filesystems)

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: threads (was Re: filesystems)
• From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 16:35:58 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Organization: Booz Allen Hamilton
• References: <r02000000-1026-3D8B2480BF8E11D7A0870003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

<Quote1>
I think you would be well-served to read the materials referenced by
threads before promoting yet another specification of only tangential
value.
</Quote1>

I think you would be well-served to read specifications before judging
them as being of only "tangential value".

<Quote2>
Just don't do it in the guise of being helpful
</Quote2>

I think you're really blowing this out of context - there was no "guise"
here.

<Quote3>
It feels to me like working the room
</Quote3>

I am not the one flailing about articles written 5 years ago when there
are so many up-to-the-minute developments to keep abreast of.

<Quote4>
Starting new threads is probably a good idea in general here anyway.
</Quote4>

I will not waste any listserv member's time by contributing any more to
this thread. Feel free to reply away all you like. :)

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton



"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> 
> chiusano_joseph@b... (Chiusano Joseph) writes:
> ><Quote>
> >I think you missed the point of the thread completely.
> ></Quote>
> >
> >I'm sorry, I don't recall referencing the "point of the thread" in my
> >response (and I have not actually had a chance to read your article).
> >My intention was simply to reference an emerging open standard that
> >incorporates XML and directories/filesystems, in the event that it may
> >have provided an additional angle to your viewpoint.
> 
> I think you would be well-served to read the materials referenced by
> threads before promoting yet another specification of only tangential
> value.
> 
> If you want to "reference an emerging open standard", that's fine.  Just
> don't do it in the guise of being helpful when you can't be bothered to
> read the context.  It feels to me like working the room, not like making
> a contribution.
> 
> Starting new threads is probably a good idea in general here anyway.
> 
> --
> Simon St.Laurent
> Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
> Errors, errors, all fall down!
> http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@b...
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: threads (was Re: filesystems)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • threads (was Re: filesystems)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: rss regularis(z)ation
• Next by Date: Re: threads (was Re: filesystems)
• Previous by thread: threads (was Re: filesystems)
• Next by thread: Re: threads (was Re: filesystems)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread