[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?

• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:59:06 -0400
• In-reply-to: <093601c35251$1b46a8b0$1401a8c0@snobird>
• References: <oprstl350fezizxn@localhost> <1059081111.4420.39.camel@z...> <oprsubx3qbezizxn@localhost> <093601c35251$1b46a8b0$1401a8c0@snobird>
• User-agent: Opera7.03/Win32 M2 build 2670

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:04:37 -0500, Bob Foster <bob@o...> wrote:

>> I think a better way to think about at least what *I* am interested in 
>> is "performance-optimized Infoset serialization."  (POIS?)
>
> You mean, where I != PSVI?

Hmm, speaking of the devil's spawn :-)  But yes, if you want to send around 
PSVIs things like ASN.1 start to be a LOT more efficient than XML 
1.0+XSD+parsing+validation, as best I understand it.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>

• References:
  • Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by Date: Re: more politics
• Previous by thread: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by thread: RE: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread