|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Non-deterministic content models
From: "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@d...> > > I am not sure this technical distinction helps the average schema writer. > > For example, rewriting an ambiguous schema so it is merely non-deterministic > > won't help XML Schema users. ;-} > > This chapter is in a book about Relax NG and its number one goal is to > help Relax NG users :-) ... Good point. Then you could probably omit that section on rewriting patterns so they are deterministic (or is it unambiguous?). RELAX NG users seldom need to do that. ;-} > > The only case I can think of where the distinction makes any difference is > > in XML Schema union types, which are allowed to be non-deterministic but are > > not unambiguous because of the first-match rule. > > Or for using Relax NG tools (such as MSV) which can derive type > information out of unambiguous schemas whether deterministic or not > (more precisely, it will provide type information even if the schema is > ambiguous but I wouldn't always advise to rely on it). That's interesting. I assume you're talking about MSV when used as a SAX2 filter. What does MSV do when it has multiple valid types, pick one? Bob Foster
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








