[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)

• To: "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@d...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 17:12:21 +0100
• In-reply-to: <33856.65.121.82.178.1057698382.squirrel@c...>
• References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030708165304.00ad2d00@s...><5.2.0.9.2.20030708100540.023f4640@s...><000b01c34555$a9074af0$6401a8c0@tbp1><Pine.LNX.4.44.0307082054410.16181-100000@l...><5.2.0.9.2.20030708165304.00ad2d00@s...>

At 23:06 08/07/2003 +0200, Eric van der Vlist wrote:

>I like to use (and use to teach) both in conjunction and end up by seeing
>them as more complementary than overlaping.
>XSLT is good at defining the structure of what you want to present and CSS
>at defining how the result of your XSLT transformation is presented.
>That being said, I don't know if it's because of XSLT but I also deplore
>the level of support of CSS in browsers (especially IE)!

Which, if M$ don't release another browser, and W3C move with
xhtml 2 (e.g. object element) and Bert gets to rec with css 3....
   will mean the majority position of ieX will ... change?
Either way, it doesn't bode well for that nice mix of xslt and css.


Complementary Eric. That's the word I was looking for.
<grin>So there Simon</grin>

regards DaveP.

• References:
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: Michael Day <mikeday@y...>
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Next by Date: RE: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread