[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: rss regularis(z)ation

• To: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Subject: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:53:15 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <oprsobm0gbezizxn@s...>
• References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030721174702.02b88368@p...> <004301c34fac$66cfced0$a000a8c0@SeairthA31> <oprsobm0gbezizxn@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Mike Champion wrote:

> Right.  The W3C is probably far too slow moving for the RSS community, 
> and few of them are members.  But more importantly, the W3C works by a 
> consensus-driven process.  The Browser Wars were bloodless, chivalric 
> skirmishes compared to the RSS vs/+ Pie/Necho/Atom/whatever wars. I 
> don't remember anyone's addictions or mental illnesses being brought up 
> in DOM Level 1 debates, anyway <duck>.
> 
> Their best bet IMHO is the IETF, where "rough consensus and running 
> code" speak louder than money and affiliation AFAIK. 

That's what I've been saying.  We'll see.
-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)

• References:
  • rss regularis(z)ation
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
  • Re: rss regularis(z)ation
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>
  • Re: rss regularis(z)ation
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: more politics
• Next by Date: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• Previous by thread: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• Next by thread: Re: rss regularis(z)ation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread