|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a
james.anderson@s... (james anderson) writes: >who is arguing to throw anything away? You're discarding human-readable markup in favor of computer-readable but otherwise gibberish labels. That seems not to be a loss to you. >i'm asking whether an authority >is going to be able to depend on documents in which its data depends >on someone elses. i'm asking, what belongs where? >From my perspective, the authority should be fed what it needs when it wants it, if those doing the feeding care how it responds. If you have enough power to force your correspondents to submit their information in such a form, great. You're doing them a disservice while avoiding an extremely simple transformation on your end, but hey - if you have the power and that's how you want to architect things, that's what you'll do. >and suggesting that, whether one admits it or not, insisting on the >blanket redundancy is the equivalent of sitting in front of a pile of >fan-fold with a very blunt pencil. a very large pile. Better a pile of fan fold with intelligibly labeled columns than a pile of cryptic codes that require constant reference to another explanation. As for the pencil, there are these things called pencil sharpeners. A penknife will do in a pinch. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








