[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar

• To: "Richard Tobin" <richard@c...>,"xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• From: "Mike Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 03:33:51 -0700
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200306172235.XAA18242@s...>

Richard Tobin wrote:
> This ia not much of a deficiency, such constraints are rare and rarely
> useful.  Though I did once get a bug report for XSV because it did not
> accept maxOccurs="4294967296".

Have to agree that it's not a big deficiency. An astronomical maxOccurs is
probably rare, and rough on validators. But it's hard to predict how people
are going to use these things. "64K RAM is all anyone will need" comes to
mind.

Mike

• References:
  • Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: analyze svg
• Next by Date: RE: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Previous by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by thread: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread