[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

• To: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Subject: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 07:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <0f2c01c33150$52ff17a0$1401a8c0@snobird>

On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Bob Foster wrote:

> Seems to me closure questions should be grounded in regular hedge (not
> regular tree) grammars, as the output sequences of XPath/XQuery are, in
> fact, hedges. I believe MURATA Makato has explored this territory (trees +
> queries = hedges).
>
> Bob

This is very true, I think when we talk about operations, we are speaking
about hedges and not trees. I am familiar with hedges, and I was speaking
in terms of hedges only.. cheers and regards - murali.

• References:
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Expressing mathematical relationships?
• Next by Date: UTF-8 use with XML
• Previous by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread