Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
At 07:22 PM 6/10/2003 +0200, Eric van der Vlist wrote: >IMO, complexity is not the main point here. What's happening with XPath >2.0 is that you're changing the nature of the language, like if you said >for Java: "the next version will not be interpreted but compiled" or >"the next version will be dynamically typed" or maybe more to the point >"you will have to provide a UML model before you can define a class in >the next version". OK, I'll bite. Why would anyone need to use anything analogous to a UML model to use XPath 2.0? Jonathan
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format