[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: XPath Data Model proposal

• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
• From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@S...>
• Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 10:35:30 -0400
• Cc: "John Cowan" <cowan@m...>, <xml-dev@l...>, <dpawson@n...>
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F80648444D@R...> (DareObasanjo's message of "Thu, 5 Jun 2003 18:35:55 -0700")
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F80648444D@R...>
• Sender: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.1 (gnu/linux)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...> was heard to say:
| This seems like a horrible idea. I sincerely hope the the working
| group does not alter the data model in such a short sighted manner
| which unnecesarily tightly couples it to W3C XML Schema while adding
| a heedless burden on implementers.

Another WG member pointed out in private mail that I may be mistaken about
our consensus position. My apologies.

I'll move this issue back into the "technical" pile and see what
happens.

BTW, cross-posting to xml-dev and public-qt-comments is probably a bad idea.
I've sent this message as two separate posts to remove the cross-post.

| ________________________________
|
| From: Norman Walsh on behalf of Norman Walsh
| Sent: Thu 6/5/2003 8:27 AM
| To: John Cowan
| Cc: public-qt-comments@w...; xml-dev@l...; dpawson@n...
| Subject:  Re: XPath Data Model proposal
| / John Cowan <cowan@m...> was heard to say:
| | In my previous posting, archived at
| | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003May/0169.html ,
| | I forgot to mention that xsi:nil should also be recognized directly
| | from the Infoset.
|
| Yes, thank you. That's been pointed out several times and was, in
| fact, supposed to be fixed before the LC draft, but somehow I missed
| it.
|
|                                         Be seeing you,
|                                           norm
[...]


                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@S...    | Words--so innocent and powerless they are, as
XML Standards Architect | standing in a dictionary, how potent for good
Web Tech. and Standards | and evil they become, in the hands of one who
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | knows how to use them!--Nathaniel Hawthorne
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+4KayOyltUcwYWjsRAkQIAJ4w0qVNyk4cX60TaMxxvuQLZNGzxgCff1HE
9CvkbF36vxmyTAuBWsyhe40=
=ThlM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• References:
  • RE: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Does SAX make sense?
• Next by Date: RE: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
• Next by thread: RE: Re: XPath Data Model proposal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread