[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0

• To: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Subject: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 23:10:57 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20030619221425.3CB8913383E@b...>
• References: <3EF1F6C1.50205@b...> <20030619221425.3CB8913383E@b...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Uche Ogbuji scripsit:

> That 
> does mean, however, that it is not really meaningful to disparage something 
> like EXSLT or SAX as "not a standard", because XSLT, RELAX NG, SOAP and other 
> such technologies are also really only "standards" in the informal sense 

Note that RELAX NG is well on its way to becoming an ISO standard.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer
mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality
is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction,
as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract.
       --_Specht v. Netscape_

• References:
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Erik Bruchez <erik@b...>
  • Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
• Next by Date: Re: Create XML
• Previous by thread: Re: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Next by thread: RE: xPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 ... size increase over v1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread