|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
> Perhaps we really mean that features which give schema developers a > meaningless sense of control are dangerous. But that's the arrogance. Sure, for every use-case someone posts, someone can post a counter-example. That doesn't make the uses less useful. The more the infrastructure can do, the better. Why should I need a special tool to see if my manifest is valid when the laws of physics and the FAA make it feasible to use XSD? > Perhaps that's hubris to you, but acknowledging that the world is beyond > the precise control of schemas seems like a useful form of humility. Nobody's refuted the calendar set of examples. And yes, it's hubris to say "nobody ever works in a controlled environment" and "schema shouldn't be allowed such fine-grain control." > And > heck, that kind of humility might even reduce the level of conflict on > these lists! Precedent's against it. :) -- Rich Salz Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








