|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
Mike Fitzgerald wrote: > Bob Foster wrote: > > From: "Mike Fitzgerald" > > Also, RELAX NG lacks the precise occurrence restraints of XML > > Schema that is, no minOccurs/maxOccurs. RNG supports only the common RE > > or DTD constraints ? * + as <optional>, <zeroOrMore>, and <oneOrMore>. > > > > Yes, but that's just shorthand; it doesn't add any additional capability. > > In some respects, it is shorthand, e.g.: > > ? is <optional> is minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" > > but you can't say a min of 9 occurrences with a max of 12 in RELAX NG; you > can in XML Schema with minOccurs="9"/maxOccurs="12". However, M-N > constraints are on the official docket for RELAX NG as a separate spec. What are the real-world use cases of minOccurs and maxOccurs? In my experience, occurrence constraints specifying anything other than zero, one, or many are almost always an indication of a bad design decision somewhere in the system. (Or maybe that *is* the use case? To be able to accurately describe badly normalized legacy RDBMSs and other such things?) --Joe English jenglish@f...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








