|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Does SAX make sense?
At 05:59 AM 5/28/2003 (a week ago!), Patrick wrote: >Another advantage is that it operates with standard XML syntax, unlike >some proposals, such as LMNL, which has its own (non-XML) format. This is a non-sequitur. Because LMNL has its own non-XML format does not mean it can't operate with standard XML syntax. LMNL is a data model, and XML syntax (or the modified "XML syntax only not well-formed" that constitutes Patrick's JITTs proposal, for that matter) could perfectly well be parsed into it. In fact, an XSLT transform works just fine to build an XML representation of a LMNL model out of arbitrary XML. It has three templates, none too complicated. It's off-topic, I know, but I wanted to clarify the record for anyone tracking the various approaches to overlapping hierarchies. Regards, Wendell ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@m... Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








