Re: modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
At 12:23 AM 6/19/2003 -0700, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: >Just for the record, I think any standards committee that *doesn't* follow >the principle of "if in doubt, leave it out" should be forced to keep >circulating their ever more bloated specification amongst themselves in a >feedback cycle until their mail servers all crash and the evil product of >their activities is lost to the bit bucket. WXS seemed to be firmly on >this track, but somehow the damned thing escaped to the wild before the >inevitable collapse. I consider it a virus. Hmmm... maybe we actually need fewer public drafts rather than more. Cruel gatekeepers might help. Or perhaps we should encourage a greater sense of shame among specification developers? Tough political problem, certainly.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format