[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Doc vs. Data

• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Doc vs. Data
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 09:01:27 +0100
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F806484454@R...>

At 13:03 06/06/2003 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:

>I've mentioned many times on the "No typing in XPath/XSLT 2.0" permathread 
>that one is not required to know or utilize XML Schema if one is working 
>on untyped XML in Xpath/XSLT 2.0.

You do need to be aware of it though, or be bitten in the bum.


>  However it is true that XPath is now strongly typed and no longer weakly 
> typed which is probably a rude shock for users of XPath/XSLT 1.0

Too right.
   A really nasty shock. This thread puts a little perspective on the variants.

regards DaveP

• References:
  • RE: Doc vs. Data
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Doc vs. Data
• Next by Date: Re: YAML Ain't Markup Language
• Previous by thread: RE: Doc vs. Data
• Next by thread: RE: Doc vs. Data
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread