• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Does SAX make sense?
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:48:49 -0700
• In-reply-to: <20030419065948.L18010@r...>
• References: <20030419065948.L18010@r...> <E196lKL-0001Uj-00@b...> <02d301c30646$b3ddc9c0$4bc8a8c0@A...>

Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
>   Personally I think SAX makes a terribly bad API for programmers, [...]

I agree, but I don't think the DOM is a whole lot better either :-)

Both are best used as a foundation for higher-level interfaces
that match the problem at hand.


--Joe English

  jenglish@f...

• References:
  • Re: Does SAX make sense?
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid Syntactic Rigor Mortis"
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Does SAX make sense?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What is the data here?
• Next by Date: Re: What is XML's appropriate place in an office suite?
• Previous by thread: Re: Does SAX make sense?
• Next by thread: Re: Does SAX make sense?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread