• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: Re: What is XML's appropriate place in an office suite?
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 19 Apr 2003 01:29:08 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <d.eae8dba.2bd17b20@a...>
• References: <d.eae8dba.2bd17b20@a...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7

AndrewWatt2000@a... writes:

> What I guess you are saying is that Richard Stallman could (or has) put 
> forward a counter argument to the point I made and that you find his counter 
> argument compelling.
> 
> Richard Stallman may be less than entirely objective about matters like this. 

That's an interesting way to refute an argument. I suppose you *are*
entirely objective?

Ari.

• References:
  • Re: What is XML's appropriate place in an office suite?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: From grammar based file to xml file
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid Syntactic Rigor Mortis"
• Previous by thread: Re: What is XML's appropriate place in an office suite?
• Next by thread: Re: What is XML's appropriate place in an office suite?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread