Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Joe English <jenglish@f...> wrote: > > Simon St.Laurent wrote: > > Uche Ogbuji writes: > > >The question of whether or not to munge reply-to is a guaranteed > > >flame-war starter, but I just wanted to put in my 2c that XML-DEV > > >does this rightly, regardless of other technical issues. > > > > And I agree with Uche on this point, adding that I wish more people > > would trim the recipients list when they reply. > > > +1. > > Also, if posters would reply To: the list (as Simon just did) > instead of To: the sender and Cc: the list (as Uche just > did), then "Reply to list" will have a better chance of > working in most MUAs. > I have no problem with the "munging" of the "reply to". That is indeed how I expect a mailing list to work. What I've been seeing is that I've got to do a "reply to all" to get things to the list instead of a simple "reply". If Simon's postings had been directly to the list, I believe a simple reply would have worked, but instead I keep finding myself needing to do a reply-to all to get things back to the list. (for example, to get a reply to the list for this e-mail.) Something's different WRT to xml-dev then the other lists I work with...
|
