• To: mbatsis@n...
• Subject: Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRig or Mortis"
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:16:33 -0400
• Cc: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <3EA014A1.7030905@n...>

mbatsis@n... (Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)) writes:
>Um, this is about the other way around; XML serializations for your RDF 
>data.

Since I have no RDF data, and that didn't appear to be Roger Costello's
original subject, I'm not sure what you're talking about at all.

http://www.xfront.com/avoiding-syntactic-rigor-mortis.html

"Below is outlined a strategy for realizing the full flexibility of XML
through the use of OWL ontologies."



-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ANN: White Paper -"Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRig or Mortis"
    • From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@n...>

• References:
  • Re: ANN: White Paper -"Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRig or Mortis"
    • From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: White Paper -"Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRig or Mortis"
• Next by Date: Re: FW: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRig or Mortis"
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: White Paper -"Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRig or Mortis"
• Next by thread: Re: ANN: White Paper -"Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRig or Mortis"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread