[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
It's a good case for out of line markup. Sure it is stiff. It should only be used in situations where expression of intensionality is important. Importance is relative and metadata is expensive. Caveat vendor. I had to see jokes and colloquialisms start flame wars on the old comp-text-sgml and VRML lists before I really understood the impacts of locale and situatedness. Then I developed a thicker skin and quit caring. I'm much better now. ;-) The real fun of it would be to feed the email threads with HumanML annotations to X3D-based avatars in a sort of ListWorld that could then simulate the discussions as if the players were face-to-face. A more revealing mirror one cannot imagine, and it would put the Osbournes and the fat blonde to shame. Finally a form of original entertainment would emerge from the WWW. len -----Original Message----- From: Uche Ogbuji [mailto:uche.ogbuji@f...] > HumanML. Now you know why. > > Humans not only tolerate noise; they enjoy it. You don't think tagged markup is a bit of a stiff solution for a mailing list? I guess that would improve the much decried markup-to-mumbling ratio around here :-)
|

Cart



