• To: "'robin.berjon@e...'" <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: RE: mischief
• From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:52:12 -0800
• Cc: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>

Right, my point is that sticking your head in the sand (a la
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/02/26/binaryxml.html ) is not a particularly
good solution either.

-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin.berjon@e...] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:09 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: 'xml-dev@l...'
Subject: Re:  mischief


Klotz, Leigh wrote:
> It should have been CDATA, of course.  I just feel sympathy for those who
> have to ship non-XML (i.e., HTML or template languages, or big TIFF
files).

Yes, that is a problem shared by *many*. It doesn't however excuse
particularly 
horrible solutions ;)

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• Prev by Date: BASE64 (was Re: CDATA)
• Next by Date: Re: CDATA
• Previous by thread: Re: mischief
• Next by thread: RE: mischief
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread