• To: <veillard@r...>, "'David Megginson'" <david@m...>
• Subject: RE: Does SAX make sense?
• From: "Martin Soukup" <martin@d...>
• Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 22:18:18 -0400
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <20030419193544.M18010@r...>

>   It all boils down to performances. In general SAX is the fastest
> even if it makes the programmer life more complex. As a general API
> it's hard to beat SAX for performances (unless the specific language
> constraints makes callbacks expensive), it is still prossible to
design
> specific APIs which may be faster than SAX (for example when avoiding
> callback costs for uneeded informations) but well they are specific...

Isn't XMLPull more performant in some cases since there is a different
thread locking location.

• References:
  • Re: Does SAX make sense?
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What is XML's appropriate place in an office suite?
• Next by Date: Re: Does SAX make sense?
• Previous by thread: Re: Does SAX make sense?
• Next by thread: RE: Does SAX make sense?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread