• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRigor Mortis"
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:44:14 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3E9EEE64.A2620F83@m...>

costello@m... (Roger L. Costello) writes:
>Thus, without a-priori agreement my application is able to process a
>trading partner's document!

Provided you picked the same ontological framework as the sender, sure.
All this does is kick the a priori agreement up a level, usually to
supposed experts.



-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRigor Mortis"
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRigor Mortis"
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>

• References:
  • Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRigor Mortis"
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRigor Mortis"
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRigor Mortis"
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRigor Mortis"
• Next by thread: Re: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid SyntacticRigor Mortis"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread