• To: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 18:24:52 -0400
• In-reply-to: <076201c30c3e$ddd86d40$b6f5d3ce@L565>

Jonathan writes:
>>OWL is hardly about "global meaning", rather about quilting together
>>small patches of local meaning into useful constructs.

Impasse/permathread warning.  

I believe that this is a Tower of Babel project that will collapse
because of the very nature of information and communications.  It'll
work fine at a small scale, but it's not going to reach the sky, and
probably shouldn't.  

Hopefully this wave will pass as its predecessors have.


-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
• Next by Date: RE: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
• Previous by thread: Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
• Next by thread: Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread