• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Whoops too much (was Re: Property dependency checking)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:54:40 -0500

++1.

This has always been true with standards, was true of SGML, 
and XML hasn't changed this.  Trust but verify twice.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:ricko@a...]

... my advice from last 
year still seems to hold:-- contracts should specify that a couple of different 
tools be used to validate data when using WXS.

• Prev by Date: redefining enumeration?
• Next by Date: Re: Problem with XSLT
• Previous by thread: redefining enumeration?
• Next by thread: RE: InfoPath, OpenOffice, XForms (Was: Low-end Office 11 won't do user schemas)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread