• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making senseof the Net
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:18:33 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3EA849FF.9040800@d...>
• References: <oprn3z6mj7ezizxn@localhost> <3EA849FF.9040800@d...>
• User-agent: Opera7.10/Win32 M2 build 2840

On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:33:03 +0100, Bill de hÓra <bill@d...> wrote:


>
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200207/msg01498.html
>
> There I linked to a paper about a hybrid architecture called InteRRaP,

Sure it CAN be both AI-ish and SW-ish ... my question was whether people 
really thought that the SW-ish parts would eventually see real-world 
deployment (e.g. by Google) or if the AI-ish parts would continue to do 
most of the heavy lifting.

Another point that Simon's rants about XML and RDF brought to mind is "if 
the AI-ish 'bots are doing the semantic tagging, will they do it with 
straight XML markup or RDF-ish markup?"  Alternatively, will the 'bots 
store the post-processed data in triple stores or XML databases ... or RDF- 
XML in XML databases, or what?

• References:
  • Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to makingsense of the Net
    • From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= <bill@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Public Identifiers
• Next by Date: Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making senseof the Net
• Previous by thread: RE: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
• Next by thread: Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread