Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Sun, 2003-04-20 at 04:14, AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote: > Over to those who care to attempt to disprove my, fairly informal, thesis > that Microsoft has joint ownership of a Microsoft Word file, as a consequence > of their ownership of the file format which forms part of such a file. > Andrew, James Anderson and Amy Lewis have thoroughly demolished your claim of joint ownership. Amy and I concede the claim of joint control. I think we can fairly infer her position on the de facto situation from her use of the term 'held hostage.' Will you accept that control != ownership? I can even understand how you might feel the word appropriate, but there are lawyers prowling, and to them words are magic spells, and if you say the wrong one or mispronounce the right one they're all over you. I still await any defense of your claim that using proprietary data formats can be a benefit. I accept that (think it's trivially obvious that) ease of use and low cost may justify using a program that uses a proprietary data format. I'm waiting for you to produce the case this program would be worse not better if it were changed to store its data in xml with a documented DTD/schema. Note also that I've mentioned the case of ephemeral data, where the user doesn't care to ever see it again and the format is thus irrelevant. In that case proprietary data rises to the level of cost-free. That is still a big step below 'benefit.' Frank
|
