• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: NIH in multiple facets
• From: "Bob Cunnings" <cunnings@w...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:25:09 -0600
• References: <E196KDu-0007rS-00@b...>

Uche Ogbuji wrote:

> Developers
> should also be very conscientious about seeking out ontologies developed
by
> other parties for import, rather than reinventing the wheel.  I think this
is
> much more important than worrying about whether the other ontology is
*just*
> the right fit for your application.

Is there a risk that reuse of ontologies may be limited by other factors,
such as licensing and competition considerations?

RC

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: NIH in multiple facets
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• References:
  • NIH in multiple facets
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why Use OWL?
• Next by Date: RE: Syntax vs semantics
• Previous by thread: NIH in multiple facets
• Next by thread: Re: NIH in multiple facets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread