• To: "'Uche Ogbuji'" <uche.ogbuji@f...>, AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: RE: What should be open/free? (Was: Low-end Office 11 won't do user...
• From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 14:13:09 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uche Ogbuji [mailto:uche.ogbuji@f...]
>
> ROTFL.  This is one of those crazy ideas that does not even 
> require an 
> additional word to rubbish.  Of course, I can imagine MSFT's 
> having the Dali 
> lightbulb go off over their heads and trying to slip this one 
> onto their next 
> EULA.  That would just make me laugh all the harder.

In this case, MSFT would be following some sort of precedent:

NZ's Largest ISP Owns Your Work
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/04/07/0243239&mode=thread&tid=158

As Pagliacci would say, "Laugh, clown. Laugh."

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What should be open/free? (Was: Low-end Office 11 w on't do user...
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: RE: CDATA
• Previous by thread: Re: What should be open/free? (Was: Low-end Office 11 won't do user...
• Next by thread: Re: What should be open/free? (Was: Low-end Office 11 w on't do user...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread