• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: CDATA)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:39:53 -0600

Thanks.  I can nail that to the wall next to the 
"it's only a syntax" rule that gets broken every 
time a programming team needs a data model.  Given 
a berm, they will burrow.

len

From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]

clbullar@i... (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>Why not NDATA?

I think Rick Jelliffe covered this last week better than I ever will.

http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200303/msg00739.html

• Prev by Date: [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 2.0
• Next by Date: Re: CDATA
• Previous by thread: [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 2.0
• Next by thread: NDATA section (was: RE: CDATA)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread