• To: Bob DuCharme <bobdc@s...>
• Subject: Re: specialized list construct. suggestions?
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:57:46 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3E9DD5A0.60608@s...>
• References: <3E9DD5A0.60608@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

Bob DuCharme wrote:
> DocBook offers seven kinds of lists, but none that quite fit this bill: 
> I'm looking for a list with a content model that is a rough equivalent 
> to a <em><li/></em> followed by li+. That is, a list where a processing 
> application is to assume that the first list item is something to be set 
> apart from the others through whatever capabilities a given platform 
> offers. Has anyone ever heard of such an animal in any DTD or schema 
> that might serve as a model for me?

If the first one is special, why doesn't it have its own element type 
name? i.e. "list heading".

  Paul Prescod

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: specialized list construct. suggestions?
    • From: Bob DuCharme <bobdc@s...>

• References:
  • specialized list construct. suggestions?
    • From: Bob DuCharme <bobdc@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Avoiding Syntactic Rigor Mortis using OWL
• Next by Date: Re: specialized list construct. suggestions?
• Previous by thread: specialized list construct. suggestions?
• Next by thread: Re: specialized list construct. suggestions?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread