• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
• From: Michael Fuller <msf@m...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:18:42 +1000
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC138@h...>
• Mail-followup-to: Michael Fuller <msf@m...>,XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC138@h...>

On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:39:57AM -0500, Len Bullard wrote:
> Well worth reading.  Unexpected conclusion.

Indeed.

Organizations for which registration of a URN NID is overly
onerous could simply use the 'tag' URI scheme and URN namespace [1].

> len

Michael

[1] "The 'tag' URI scheme and URN namespace"
    Internet Draft
    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kindberg-tag-uri-04.txt

• References:
  • RE: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The Zen of xml-dev (was Re: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces)
• Next by Date: Re: OT: Patterns on XML-dev
• Previous by thread: Re: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
• Next by thread: RE: Draft US Government policyon XML Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread