Re: 3 possible approaches for representing concepts
Uche Ogbuji wrote: > Joe, BTW, I'm with you on selecting #2. #1 and #3 probably mean that at some > point there will come a need to break down the semantics in the complex GI, and I > think that GIs should be as close to atomic as possible for the expected life of > the data. BTW my personal prejudice is also for #2, *but* #2 is just as likely to need to be *composed* into a more monolithic form as #1 and #3 are likely to need de-composing. And that's just the point. Once we posit the internetwork providing a web relationship among processing nodes, once we truly expect reuse and repurposing, it makes no sense to chose a markup style based on an anticipated use downstream: the most valuable uses over time will be the unanticipated ones. Respectfully, Walter Perry
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format