• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Schema style and parser performance
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:33:20 -0400
• In-reply-to: <200304301246.NAA26606@s...>

richard@c... (Richard Tobin) writes:
>I wouldn't expect any noticeable difference.  In XSV we generate a
>finite-state machine for content models, with the states having
>pointers to the element declarations and the element declarations
>having pointers to the type declarations, so there is no looking-up of
>element or type names in the usual case (there is for wildcards of
>course).

I wouldn't expect a huge performance difference on the computer side.  

I do see large differences in how humans work with these different
forms, and transitions from Russian Doll to Venetian Blind seem to lose
a lot of people along the way.  Reading schemas that mix styles can be
an interesting challenge.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Schema style and parser performance
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@x...>

• References:
  • Re: Schema style and parser performance
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Schema style and parser performance
• Next by Date: Cancer Research / Clinical Trials Examples
• Previous by thread: Re: Schema style and parser performance
• Next by thread: Re: Schema style and parser performance
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread