• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Data streams and schema use and identification
• From: Dan Vint <dvint@m...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:49:26 -0700
• In-reply-to: <51B8ABCE456FD111899900805F6FD6EE12EDFBF0@m...>

At 11:30 AM 4/24/2003 -0700, Klotz, Leigh wrote:
>In XForms [1] we explicitly state that xsi:schemaLocation and friends are
>ignored inside the instance document, and provide an attribute on the
><model> element to allow the author to specify a normative list of Schema
>URI references that must be resolved to provide the Schema components for
>assessment.  XForms further allows direct inclusion of the <xs:schema>
>element inside the model.  <xs:schema> elements may appear outside the
><model> but in the enclosing document and be referred to fromn the
>model@schema attribute as fragments, if the host language supports
>fragments.

Ok that is an interesting approach that I didn't know about. Now if we 
could only get something like that to be standard practice or somehow part 
of the Schema spec I would be happy. 

• References:
  • RE: Data streams and schema use and identification
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Data streams and schema use and identification
• Next by Date: RE: ANN: Article on using RDF to provide extensibility and modularity
• Previous by thread: RE: Data streams and schema use and identification
• Next by thread: OT: Lots of xml-dev'ers quoted in this article
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread