• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Property dependency checking
• From: "Bob Foster" <bob@x...>
• Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:04:13 -0500
• References: <09cc01c300ff$1e0dfec0$1401a8c0@snobird>

Whoops. I got carried away and wrote:

> ...If you're waiting for a significant
> body of all-Schematron schemas, I would guess it will be a long wait.

Talk about your flame-bait! If I had a cancel I would use it. My apologies
to Rick and anyone else who got that far into the message. Of course there
is a 'significant body' of all-Schematron schemas. The fact that I prefer to
use Schematron to augment other kinds of schemas is beside the point.

Bob

• Follow-Ups:
  • Whoops too much (was Re: Property dependency checking)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • Re: Property dependency checking
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Property dependency checking
• Next by Date: Namespace vs Prefix in error message: friendly versus correct?
• Previous by thread: Re: Property dependency checking
• Next by thread: Whoops too much (was Re: Property dependency checking)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread