• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: CDATA
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 23:56:26 -0500
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC083@h...>

[Bullard, Claude L (Len)]
>
> If one wants to do more (eg, stuffing inlined
> binaries), the fragility of XML starts to out

I do not see it as fragility of XML.  It is when you stick in binary data
and some of the other things that it gets fragile. XML as it is now seems to
be pretty robust, not fragile - especially since we can edit it with the
good old text editor.  Even modulo external parsed entities, not fragile.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • RE: CDATA
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Design as, one hopes, not premature optimization
• Next by Date: Re: 3 possible approaches for representing concepts
• Previous by thread: Re: CDATA
• Next by thread: RE: CDATA
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread