• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: CDATA)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:28:17 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC081@h...>

clbullar@i... (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>Why not NDATA?

I think Rick Jelliffe covered this last week better than I ever will.

http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200303/msg00739.html

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: CDATA)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: CDATA)
• Next by Date: [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 2.0
• Previous by thread: Why Not NDATA? (WAS RE: CDATA)
• Next by thread: [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 2.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread