• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making senseof the Net
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 18:37:25 -0400
• References: <BKELLDAGKABIOCHDFDBPEEPCCIAA.danny666@v...><oprn41i3h9ezizxn@s...>

[Mike Champion

> > A question - do you think Google takes note of the title of documents it
> > indexes?
>
> AFAIK, no.  Is that a trick question :-)  <title> is a classic example of
> metacrap that web page authors don't consistently make much sensible use
> of, and thus Google doesn't bother with, would be my guess.
>

Browser bookmarks can actually be better than web pages, because - at least
I find this for myself - when I bookmark a page with a poor title I
generally edit it before saving.  I have found these (edited) bookmark
titles to have a lot of useful semantic content.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • RE: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
    • From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
  • Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making senseof the Net
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Public Identifiers
• Next by Date: Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to makingsenseof the Net
• Previous by thread: Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
• Next by thread: RE: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to makingsenseof the Net
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread