• To: Mike Champion <mc@x...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Low-end Office 11 won't do user schemas, it seems
• From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>
• Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:55:30 +0100
• In-reply-to: <oprnhpe0hlezizxn@s...>
• References: <20030411221833.GA28707@s...> <20030411191254.E28785@r...> <oprnhpe0hlezizxn@s...>

On Saturday 12 April 2003 01:10, Mike Champion wrote:

> I honestly don't see why
> they bother with WordML; what is the *point* of storing data in XML if the
> schema is so hideous and proprietary than no one can use it without
> proprietary API support? 

Buzzword compliance(tm) without the danger of interoperability with the nasty 
competitors?

> Sigh, I thought Office 2003 looked too good to be true.  I was a fool, but
> I believed ...

*manly pat on shoulder*

s'OK, we all hope once in a while...

ABS

-- 
A city is like a large, complex, rabbit
 - ARP

• References:
  • Low-end Office 11 won't do user schemas, it seems
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Low-end Office 11 won't do user schemas, it seems
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: Low-end Office 11 won't do user schemas, it seems
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Low-end Office 11 won't do user schemas, it seems
• Next by Date: Re: What are people using SVG for?
• Previous by thread: Re: Low-end Office 11 won't do user schemas, it seems
• Next by thread: Re: Low-end Office 11 won't do user schemas, it seems
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread