[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • To: "Sean McGrath" <sean.mcgrath@p...>,<xml-dev@l...>
  • Subject: RE: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp
  • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 05:29:03 -0800
  • Thread-index: AcL4LAq2i91KF4jXSfe6E6zpuH+HOQAJhF/D
  • Thread-topic: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp

As far as I'm concerned there is an XML data model. It's currently specced by the W3C and is named the XQuery & XPath 2.0 data model. 
It'sXML infoset based, meets most of the requirements of people like Joe Gregorio who want regex-able XML and works well for both untyped or typed data. 
 
The name is a mouthful, so I tend to call it the XPath data model for short although I've recently taken to calling it the XML data model. 

________________________________

From: Sean McGrath [mailto:sean.mcgrath@p...]
Sent: Tue 4/1/2003 12:48 AM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject:  XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp



This is at the core of why I've always argued that we *do* need a data
model for XML and we *do* need something like
common XML because I want my processing to be both correct *and* non-lossy
(high input fidelity).

Is that too much to ask?

Any I the only one who wants both?

Sean



http://seanmcgrath.blogspot.com



-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>




Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member