• To: "Mike Champion" <mc@x...>,"'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:32:56 +0200
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <oproe3pqfgezizxn@s...>

> From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@x...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 3:00 AM
> To: 'XML Dev'
> Subject:  Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: 
> XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
>
> ...
> hot potatoes); c) the 'unenlightened' but influential folks in Redmond WA
> and Washington DC are voting with their feet for URNs and this debate is
> likely to become moot Real Soon Now; and d) W3C could have "reinvented
> HTTP" to resolve URNs in a distributed, reliable manner several
> times over
> with the effort that has gone into this debate.
> ...

Really? Office 2003's new namespaces seem to use HTTP URLs (for instance,
WordML).

Julian


--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML1.1 grinds to halt?)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds tohalt?)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: hackathon at Open Source Conference
• Next by Date: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Next by thread: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread