• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: InfoPath, OpenOffice, XForms (Was: Low-end Office 1 1 won't do user schemas)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 14:00:04 -0400
• In-reply-to: <BD2DBD26EE0BAA48B1A425C7BE7923002D033D@c...>

MDubinko@c... (Micah Dubinko) writes:
>>And I think they also have in mind a much more nuanced marketing 
>>approach.
>
>Their approach is as nuanced as the top notch in a food chain.

It might seem more nuanced if there was any clear explanation about the
details of what they're doing.  Lack of nuance combined with lack of
detail - aren't we really analyzing footnotes here? - is pretty
frustrating.

More generally frustrating - and certainly not limited to Microsoft - is
the general notion that XML is stuff for the enterprise only.  That's
completely exasperating, and a perception that I was really hoping
Office would change.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • RE: InfoPath, OpenOffice, XForms (Was: Low-end Office 11 won't do user schemas)
    • From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What are people using SVG for?
• Next by Date: Re: Bioinformatics data standards.
• Previous by thread: RE: InfoPath, OpenOffice, XForms (Was: Low-end Office 11 won't do user schemas)
• Next by thread: RE: What are people using SVG for?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread