[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


David Megginson wrote:

> Because Postscript is a procedural language, there's inevitably going
> to be something you can do with it that you cannot do as efficiently
> (or at all) with a declarative language.  Whatever that something is,
> I doubt it's worth the complexity tradeoff, but all the same, don't be
> surprised when someone pulls it out.

I once wrote filling-and-justification code in PostScript for a tech 
manual authored in something like XML.  It only worked because these 
were little nuggets that by definition had to fit on a page.  And it 
sure made the printer run slow.  But they looked great.
-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member