• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: CDATA
• From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>
• Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:53:55 -0500
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC07E@h...>

How about <![BASE64[ ]]>.  This way, we still keep the character data and
allow a "standardized" way of encoding/decoding binary.

---
Seairth Jacobs
seairth@s...


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
To: "'Rick Jelliffe'" <ricko@a...>; <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:16 AM
Subject: RE:  CDATA


> Maybe the requirement is to support NDATA.  I get a lot
> of inquiries about stuffing jpegs, etc, inline.  When
> I show them the limited means, I get frowns.  Perhaps
> it is time to revisit that permathread.

• References:
  • RE: CDATA
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: CDATA
• Next by Date: RE: CDATA
• Previous by thread: RE: CDATA
• Next by thread: RE: CDATA
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread