RE: XML too hard for programmers?
dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo) writes: >As for Micah's post, I'm not sure what his conclusion has to do with >Tim's post. All we need is xml:id and everything will be OK? Huh? Did you read to the end of it? "This isn't the only thing that could make XML more pleasant (there is, for example, Tom Bradford's Clean Namespaces proposal), but definately in the top 15." It might be interesting to see what a complete 15 would look like. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format