Re: Re: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd be b
Greg Alvord wrote: > Bill de hÓra Wrote: > >>And I don't understand this disdain for regular expressions over >>XML. Regexes are a perfectly useful tool for manipulating text. > > > Certainly "If all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail." > applies here. (No distain, I own more than one hammer) I should have said "I don't understand this disdain for regular expressions over XML, once you know what you're doing", where "know what you're doing" implies enough to know that regexes won't cover the gamut of XML! > There are two worlds. The world of the "value space" and that of the > "lexical space". If you use a lexical space tool you run the risk of making > a new lexical representation for which there is NO value space equivalent. The worlds I'm thinking about are different again, namely the worlds of regular and context-free grammars. > In other words, could you make an error with a regEx tool and end up with > invalid XML? Yes easily, and probably often. No argument there. > If you use tools that manipulate in the "value space", then obtain the > lexical representation that risk goes away. That sounds like a job for XPath, among others. Bill de hÓra
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format